Reddit has emerged as the most influential content source for large language models, representing 40% of all LLM citations as of mid-2025. This guide explores whether specific factors influence if a Reddit thread gets surfaced by ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, and other AI tools—providing marketers with some directional guidance for strategic Reddit engagement.
Key Finding:
Of all the factors we looked at including relevancy, popularity, subreddit size, the only thing we can conclude is that the LLMs will cite a reddit thread if it matches the query relevance of the user regardless of other factors.
This is part 1 of a 3-part Reddit marketing series for marketers interested in reddit for LLM visibility.
Part 2 outlines a step-by-step plan for getting started on Reddit for LLM visibility
Part 3 describes exactly how to comment and post with examples
A note on credibility (and why this post is careful)
This post mixes:
Supported claims (factors that have other citations confirming the same thing we observed)
Observed patterns from small-scale experiments we ran
Hypotheses that are plausible but not proven without larger sampling
According to recent studies Reddit isn’t just a place to market to humans—it’s one of top two sources for most large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity. These AI tools now regularly quote Reddit threads in their answers, meaning showing up on Reddit can get your brand surfaced automatically in future AI responses.
Important Update: There has been a recent citation pattern shift (September 2025)
| What this means for marketers: Citation patterns are volatile and platform-dependent. Diversify your strategy across multiple LLM sources rather than optimizing for one platform. |
Even with the volatility of citation patterns, Reddit will continue to play an important role in training LLMs and providing answers in real time search. There are a few reasons for this:
So if a Reddit thread is public, indexable, and a good match to the query, it has a path to show up.
1. Exact topical match to the user’s query (supported claim)
There is evidence for several academic papers and a test carried out by Semrush which proves that LLMs using RAG systems match queries against content based on semantic similarity and intent alignment. (See Wang et al. (2024). A Multi-Granularity Matching Attention Network for Query Intent Classification. Research on query intent matching in information retrieval.)
That means threads that clearly solve the intent (e.g., “Which Salesforce email-finder alternatives work for direct dials in EMEA?”) beat vague titles and descriptive titles. Further, our experiments on recency and experiments running different queries surfaced both new threads and threads with as little as 4 comments confirming that upvotes and age are not as important as query and intent alignment.
How to operationalize
2. Entity-rich, experience based that the model can quote (supported)
LLMs disproportionately like content they can quote verbatim or near-verbatim: tools, versions, configs, ICPs, constraints, metrics, datasets, regions, budgets, timelines. Research on RAG systems shows that models prioritize content with specific entities, metrics, and verifiable claims over general observations. (Gao et al. (2023). Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey.)
How to operationalize
3. Indexability & safety compliance (supported)
To be surfaced, a thread must be public, crawlable, and safe. NSFW/restricted/private content or heavy self-promo can be down-ranked/omitted in AI answers. Google’s AI features show snapshots with links but apply quality/safety filters; surfaced items also tend to overlap with what ranks organically. (Wikipedia (2025). Retrieval-augmented generation. Overview of RAG systems and external knowledge integration.)
How to operationalize
There was no correlation between active, large subs and smaller subs. Both showed up in the queries we ran in ChatGPT.
How to operationalize
5. Engagement quality (no correlation)
Across all our experiments we found thread age, votes, and comment counts were weak predictors across engines; a low-vote but high-signal thread can still surface if it nails intent and is indexable.
How to operationalize
6. Recency signals (supported for time-sensitive topics)
While recency in general does not seem to matter with many threads that are older than 1 year sometimes being cited, because Google and OpenAI have real-time pipes to Reddit, recent posts/comments can be discovered and cited when the topic evolves quickly (APIs change, pricing, outages, tactics). Read more: blog.google
In our experiments, brand-new thread appeared in Perplexity almost immediately; other models varied depending on whether they searched.
How to operationalize
7. Funnel stage fit (Hypothesis)
In our experiment feeding tofu/mofu/bofu queries for specific topics, Reddit showed up primarily for MOFU/BOFU queries (comparisons, trade-offs, troubleshooting, “which tool for X constraint”). Broad TOFU questions were often answered from static training data instead.
This is not something we have seen in academic research or other research and tests so at this point, this is something you should take as directional guidance.
How to operationalize
Myth 1: "More upvotes = guaranteed citation"
Reality: Our research found cited threads with as few as 0-10 upvotes. Topical relevance and specificity matter more than engagement signals.
Myth 2: "Brand accounts should post on Reddit"
Reality: Reddit users are highly skeptical of brand accounts. Individual thought leaders and practitioners get more engagement and trust. Your team members posting authentically is more effective than a branded presence. Once you grow in size and have a lot of users and a community, then having a brand account to communicate to your users makes sense.
Myth 3: "New threads won't get cited quickly"
Reality: Search-enabled LLMs like Perplexity can cite content within 24 hours if it matches query intent and has some engagement. Speed to citation varies by platform.
Myth 4: "Only viral threads get cited"
Reality: Niche, specific threads with 10-20 comments often get cited over massive viral threads if they better match the query intent. Quality and relevance beat popularity.
Myth 5: "Citations only come from training data"
Reality: Modern LLMs use RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) to search the live web. Your Reddit content from last week can be cited today if it ranks well in search results.
Reddit citations in LLMs are not random: specific patterns around query intent, content structure, and recency.
Focus your efforts on MOFU and BOFU content: where LLMs actively search for and cite Reddit discussions. Skip TOFU where training data dominates.
Be specific and detailed: tool names, metrics, constraints, and real-world context are what LLMs need to quote your contributions.
Authenticity beats promotion: balanced, experience-driven content dramatically outperforms sales-focused posts.
Platform behaviors vary significantly: Perplexity loves Reddit, ChatGPT prefers Wikipedia, Google AI Overviews balances multiple UGC sources. Diversify your strategy.
Engagement metrics are unreliable predictors: topical relevance and subreddit quality matter more than upvotes or comment counts.
Citation patterns are evolving rapidly: what worked in June 2025 may not work in October 2025. Stay adaptive and monitor changes.
This is a long-term strategy: building authority and citation presence takes consistent, authentic participation over months, not days.
This guide covered what factors influence whether Reddit content gets cited by LLMs. Future parts of this series will address:
| Part 4: Reporting and measuring Reddit activity for LLM visibility |
Setup:
|
Funnel |
Total Queries |
Reddit |
Dominant Subreddits |
Median Upvotes |
Median Comments |
Reddit |
|
Top of Funnel |
11 |
0 |
— |
— |
— |
0% |
|
Middle of Funnel |
11 |
4 |
r/marketing, r/startup, r/sideproject |
16.5 |
7 |
36% |
|
Bottom of Funnel Features, Compliance, Pricing, Troubleshooting |
11 |
3 |
r/marketing, r/growthhacking, |
17 |
9 |
27% |